Step One: Sitemap

This is the page for the First Step of the Frontend design process

NOTE: On Sunday, April 6, several imc – alternatives volunteers who are interested in designing the site met in IRC to start moving forward. We decided the first step toward developing a site would be to solicit thoughts about the “sitemap,” which is the general structure of the site, i.e. what will go on the main page, what will exist in subsections, what will go in subsections of those subsections….

We are going meet again in the #alternatives room on the chat.indymedia.org server on Sunday, April 27, 9pm U.S. eastern time (which is actually Monday morning, April 28, at 01:00 GMT). Between now and then, please edit this page, adding your vision for the alternatives site’s sitemap.

Michael: I created a Features Page for collaborative ranking here.

Overall vision of the IMC – Alternatives Sitemap

  1. Main Sections:
  • Home
    • open newswire
    • featured articles
  • Knowledge Base
  • Categories
  • Networking

General Ideas about what the site might look like:

  • FRONTPAGE
    • open newswire
    • featured articles
  • KNOWLEDGE BASE
  • CATEGORIES
    • tagged
    • featured articles
  • NETWORKING (user/group profiles)
    • mailing lists/ group lists (networking)
    • wiki pages (networking feature)
    • calendar (networking feature)
    • connections (networking? feature)
    • want lists (craigslist style)

Jay’s Ideas about what the site might look like:

  • FRONTPAGE:
    In my vision, the main page of the alternatives site won’t look too different than a traditional IMC site (see www.phillyimc.org for an example), with a logo and navigation bar up top, blurbs for features below, and one column devoted to open publishing newswire/“solutions-wire”. Using the PhillyIMC site as a model, I picture there being one or two top alternatives features, posted by an editorial collective, but the blurbs that on the PhillyIMC site are used to link to past features would instead, in our case, link to the subpages for our categories: “alternative energy,” “healthcare,” “political structures,” etc. Click on that link and you’ll get to the subject page for that category. There will also be links to the knowledge base and to networking parts of the site.
    • open newswire/solutions-wire (perhaps an edited version of the newswire, with the open version being one click away, so we can filter out the many posts that will come in that aren’t about alternatives)
    • featured articles
  • CATEGORIES
    • category newswire: when people post to the main solutions-wire they will tag their article to appear in one of our sub-categories. The article will appear in that sub-category’s own solutions-wire. So, an article posted to the main solutions-wire about local currencies will appear both on the main solutions-wire and on the “alternative economics” category page.
    • featured articles about the category in question
  • KNOWLEDGE BASE: this will be a practical wikified how-to guide, compiled by site users, about how to implement alternatives. Like the the solutions-wire articles, when someone adds an article to the knowledge base s/he will tag it to a particular category and the article will appear in the knowledge base section of that category page.
  • NETWORKING: my current vision of this is that we’ll blend some form of the crabgrass software into the imc-alternatives site, tweaking it to fulfill networking needs of individuals, organizations and networks of organizations.
    • mailing lists/ group lists (networking)
    • wiki pages (networking feature)
    • calendar (networking feature)
    • connections (networking? feature)
    • want lists (craigslist style)

We have also talked in passing about different levels of user logins. Right now I envision an anonymous, non-registered user being able to post and maybe comment to the solutions-wire, as well as view users’ and organizations’ own public personal pages and e-mail them through the site. Registered users will be able to add to the knowledge base wiki and participate fully in the networking components, including being able to view users’ and organizations’ non-public home pages (i.e. stuff they designate to be just available to alternatives site users). I currently envision another group of users that have a level of access that enables them to be the editorial collective/admins of the site. I’m not sure whether I’d rather see all registered users have the ability to edit features on the front page and category pages, or if that should just be for the editorial collective/admin users.

Michael’s Thoughts about what the site might look like:

When I have thought about “Alternatives” I have imagined that the site in and of itself would represent an alternative vision, or visions, of what an IMC site can look like and function as, how it could continue to evolve as the needs of the community evolve and change….as the times and technologies change. To me, Alternatives represents a wide-opened gateway to introduce the public to new, innovative tools and resources. So, in other words, I don’t only think we should be a space for discussing or announcing alternatives, but exploration and leading by example(s).

  • Skill-shares and Labor-exchange (Crabgrass will actually have these as features, I believe)
  • Video-sharing: Essential for any IMC, but in this context would provide a great documentative aspect to the site.
  • Photo-sharing/galleries and slideshows:
  • Forums
  • Freebay.org-like aspect (could be an integrated part of want-lists)
  • Bartering aspect to want-lists: where people can post skills or materials wanted, and what skills/materials they might have to barter in exchange.
  • Some block organizing tools stylized from the yahoo front page, such as center left block.
    we.riseup.net/assets/1032/yahoo_front_page.png
  • A new more visual java approach to the city list would be nice, more like a globe that can be rotated and zoomed in, with imc’s instead of cities. This could be in addition to the old method, and within one of the top yahoo-like tabs
  • a wikipedia-like feature for resources/history, possibly somehow connected with the crabgrass public wiki documents/pages, and readily searchable by multiple methods.
  • Customizable front page for registered users, like my yahoo or igoogle.
  • A ticker-tape headline/alert banner above top horizontal menu, instead of the block method on phillyimc. This would allow for more headlines or other important news blurbs and given today’s advances could be visually appealing and interactive.
  • Weather from weatherunderground….we should strive to provide things mainstream people look for, and also just try and provide more than the usual political fair in order to expand the audience, but also provide various levels of information.
  • Blogs, definitely blogs
  • Columns for the editorial collective active volunteers, with similar rules like on op-ed news.
  • Deep rss feeds
  • Certain parts of the site aligned with editorial standards to get picked up by the various news aggregating services out there, like digg, wordpress, yahoo, google, etc.
  • The ability of users to personalize rss feeds for live bookmarks by tags/topics of preference.
  • Frontend page that links with the crabgrass tool by providing info to users such as inbox messages or recent emails.
  • a simple log in. I don’t think it has to be huge, but can simply be a hyperlinked “Log in” with a page for logging in.

Responses from Jay:

Michael, these are great ideas. As we move toward solidifying a sitemap, I think we should start with really basic architecture and build up. A lot of the ideas you have are for features we should eventually add to the site. To get closer to mapping the site, what I’m going to do is go through the list of features and suggest where they might fit within the basic structural sitemap I suggested. Here’s a first shot at it:

MAIN PAGE:

— Some block organizing tools stylized from the yahoo front page, such as center left block. we.riseup.net/assets/1032/yahoo_front_p...

—A new more visual java approach to the city list would be nice, more like a globe that can be rotated and zoomed in, with imc’s instead of cities. This could be in addition to the old method, and within one of the top yahoo-like tabs

— Customizable front page for registered users, like my yahoo or igoogle.

— A ticker-tape headline/alert banner above top horizontal menu, instead of the block method on phillyimc. This would allow for more headlines or other important news blurbs and given today’s advances could be visually appealing and interactive.

— Weather from weatherunderground….we should strive to provide things mainstream people look for, and also just try and provide more than the usual political fair in order to expand the audience, but also provide various levels of information. Jay’s note: I’m not sure the alternatives site needs to try to be all things to all people, but we should definitely talk about what kind of features we need to add to inspire people to spend use the site as one of their main destinations.

— Blogs, definitely blogs Jay’s note: in addition to the open-publishing "solutions-wire" we could have a "solutoins blog-wire" with headlines from alternatives blogs

— Frontend page that links with the crabgrass tool by providing info to users such as inbox messages or recent emails.

— a simple log in. I don’t think it has to be huge, but can simply be a hyperlinked “Log in” with a page for logging in.

ON KNOWLEDGE BASE PAGE:

— a wikipedia-like feature for resources/history, possibly somehow connected with the crabgrass public wiki documents/pages, and readily searchable by multiple methods.

— Skill-shares and Labor-exchange (Crabgrass will actually have these as features, I believe)

— Freebay.org-like aspect (could be an integrated part of want-lists)

ON CATEGORY PAGES and throughout site:
— Video-sharing: Essential for any IMC, but in this context would provide a great documentative aspect to the site.

— Photo-sharing/galleries and slideshows:

— Forums

THROUGHOUT SITE:

— Deep rss feeds

— Certain parts of the site aligned with editorial standards to get picked up by the various news aggregating services out there, like digg, wordpress, yahoo, google, etc.

— The ability of users to personalize rss feeds for live bookmarks by tags/topics of preference.

This is just a first pass. We can pin things down better as we go forward.
ADD YOUR OWN IDEAS HERE

 

This is a good start. But it is too much. We need to cut it down. For instance it might make sense to launch it with a basic feature set, and then only once those are being used by lots of people to add the advanced features.

Getting enough people to use the website will be hard. Probably harder than designing it.

Personally, I like websites where I see features that are being used by many people. If I see an unused feature, it makes the site look bad and discourages me. I want to click on a link and see loads of exciting content!

 
 

That is ok, but there is no need to lock the page from further editing. We can’t collectively edit this page and narrow it down unless it is unlocked. We are just basically brainstorming now. What we need to do is evaluate the list of suggested features and then add to the page dedicated to Phase Development. I am going to break the lock so we can continue to work on this list collaboratively.

 
   

I am going to start two pages: one that established a ranked vote for site features (meaning the features we, as a group, decide are most important or relative to the first “basic” install for the website, and also listing the features in order of preference and priority. The other page will list the phases of development, with the final product being that of the version we are aiming to provide. I will update another previously made page to reflect our collective vision. I will hyperlink these pages once they are roughed out to this page and the front wiki as well.